Search This Blog

Friday, May 17, 2013

Critical Reflective Essay


Whitney Walters
Dr. Halverson
English 102
17 May 2013
Critical Reflective Essay

            Writing my research paper was quite a journey filled with many writer’s blocks, long frustrated nights, and even a few desperate cries of confusion. When my professor said we should be thinking about our topic for a research question, I knew that I wanted to do women in mental institutions, but that was about all I knew.  Before I knew it, I was all over the place, researching women in insane asylums and how they have evolved, to the different kinds of treatment one can receive in an asylum, along with the rise of female journalists.  I first took the route of the female journalists and researched two women that went undercover in mental institutions, one in the 19th century and one in the 21st century. For this part of our research, my professor didn’t require us to use scholarly sources because we were just dipping our feet in the water of searching for sources.  I soon realized that this wasn’t going to work, the time gap was such a difference and the more modern story had very little written about it. I was fascinated by the female journalist from the 19th century named Nellie Bly and her story really helped not only my research question, but also my final draft of my research paper. From her story, I decided to narrow down my research question to the rise of the Victorian madwoman and their roles in the insane asylums during the 19th century.
            With my research question somewhat figured out, it was time crack down and start researching. My professor showed us how to navigate our campus’s library website to use databases to search for scholarly sources.  At first I did many searches that only involved insane asylums and women, but the results didn’t have the time period I needed. I became very discouraged that this research topic just wasn’t going to work, until my professor recommended Elaine Showalter’s book that became the forerunner for my paper.  The book looked into Victorian woman and madness and from that I searched the databases for the oppression of Victorian madwoman and the hysteria that surrounded them. I had to order many articles and books, some were mediocre and not relatable to my research question, but others were wonderful and helped me really shape my question and they gave me more keywords to search for in databases.  I started reading my secondary research articles and books and took thorough notes so I could reference them later for my paper. We then found out in class that we would need to do some primary research that could include surveys, interviews, or cultural analysis. I first wanted to visit a mental institution near my town and ask some questions, but I decided against it because they might not know anything about how Victorian women in insane asylums were treated. I then decided to use Nellie Bly’s book called Ten Days in a Mad-House for my primary research, reading and taking notes on it.
            With most of my research done, I wrote very rough drafts that I knew would need a lot of work. My peer’s main concern with my paper was my organization and lengthy paragraphs. They enjoyed the beginning where I talked about the reasons why Victorian women were sent to asylums, but they felt that I just pegged Nellie Bly’s story at the end and could include it more in the previous paragraphs. My professor felt the same way and recommended that I break my paragraphs up because they were too lengthy and dragged on. I took another go at my paper and wrote a second draft that I felt pretty good about. My professor said it was an excellent draft, but I relied on my Elaine Showalter source too much and needed to add more about female oppression during the 19th century. Taking her comments into consideration, I ordered the books that she suggested and found some new articles that could help make my paper better. I also added more accounts of stories to demonstrate the reasons women were sent to asylums. My professor really liked the way I edited Nellie Bly’s story, but recommended that I quote more from it and try to find another source about her. I went through her story again and made sure to use more in-text citations along with quoting to help improve that portion of my paper.
            I feel that my journey has really helped me improve as a writer, especially when it comes to scholarly writing. In high school, we had to write research papers, but we could use Google or Wikipedia as sources. This course has taught me how to search for scholarly sources and how to properly cite them when using their information in my paper. I felt that a lot of research has been done on the oppression of women and on insane asylums during the 19th century, but not many discussions have tied them together and researched them both. I feel that my paper does just that, talking about the insane asylums and their treatment, along with the role that Victorian women had in society and the reasons they were sent to these asylums.  I also feel that I no scholarly discourse has involved Nellie Bly into the mix, but my paper includes her story along with how it speaks to the oppression of women. I think my paper and blog as a whole has really brought the two ideas I mentioned above into one cohesive research question that I wrote my paper on. 

The Hype of the Madwoman


Whitney Walters
Dr. Halverson
English 102
16 May 2013
The Hype of the Madwomen
     “Men were always quick to believe in the madness of women.”- Alison Goodman. This quote speaks a lot about how women were viewed by society in the nineteenth century and still today.  It was commonly thought that every woman was born mad and if she hadn’t shown her madness yet, it was bubbling under the surface, threatening to come up and give adequate reason to send her to an insane asylum. During the nineteenth century, female hysteria skyrocketed and asylums saw more women patients than ever before, causing the rise of the Victorian madwoman. This rise and their role in insane asylums were due to many gender roles and the oppression of women during the nineteenth century, some of which my paper will delve into by looking at detailed accounts of these women who inhabited the asylums.

Why Women?
            Some may ask what started this idea that women were mad lunatics, running around ready to strike at any minute. Surely women couldn’t have gone mad at the turn of the century, but rather they have been mad all along and much thought wasn’t given to it until the nineteenth century. The differentiation began at the end of the eighteenth century when a shift occurred in the way madness was viewed and treated (Showalter 8). Lunatics were formerly seen as brutes, ferocious animals that needed to be kept in chains and strait jackets living in heavily locked cells, but there was the first psychiatric revolution that turned lunatics to be seen merely as sick humans that were pitied (Showalter 8). This revolution caused many reformers, wealthy philanthropists, and magistrates looked into how insanity was treated in private madhouses, workhouses, and prisons. They used their findings to create an alternate way to treat insanity, and started insane asylums where patients were heavily surveillance (Showalter 8). This turn also shifted lunatics from being male patients to female patients. Surprisingly, in the middle of the eighteenth century, the most common image of madness was a sculpture of two male nudes manacled together (Showalter 8). By 1815, the rape and murder of women patients by madhouse keepers changed this image of the madman and replaced it with a victimized and delicate lady (Showalter 9).  There seemed to be a fundamental link between femininity and insanity, with women being represented as irrational, and men being seen as reasonable and knowledgeable (Showalter 4).   Insane asylums entrapped women with greater ease, kept them longer, and released them with less frequency than their male peers (Matlock 167). In fact, there are files of a doctor named Richard Napier from the seventeenth century that shows that women made up nearly twice as many cases of mental disorder than men (Showalter 3) and there were 1,182 female lunatics for every 1,000 male lunatics (Showalter 52).

Stress of the Ideal Victorian Woman
Two centuries later, the “Angel in the House” emerged. It was the Victorian feminine ideology, coined by Coventry Patmore in his epic that portrayed an idealized image of the Victorian woman: cooking, cleaning, and tending to her husband’s every need (Yildirim 114). The Victorian ideology of women is perhaps best represented by Queen Victoria herself, when she described marriage as a “great happiness... in devoting oneself to another who is worthy of one's affection; still, men are very selfish and the woman's devotion is always one of submission which makes our poor sex so very unenviable... it cannot be otherwise as God has willed it so" (Yildirim 117). The perfect Victorian woman’s main mission was to serve others dutifully and selflessly and to be deemed a “lady”; women had to follow the norms and manners inflicted upon them by the society (Yildirim 117). In the Victorian social pyramid, a woman was always considered secondary both in the family and society and her only role was to be a servant to her husband and children, having no desires or needs outside of this role (Yildirim 118). Acting in anyway outside of the gender norms pressed upon women was not acceptable and could lead to a one-way ticket to an insane asylum. 
There are many causes as to why women make up the majority of mental disorder patients, ranging from sexual oppression to stress from their family life. Most female patients are a product of their social situations, both from their confining roles as daughters, wives, and mothers and their mistreatment by a male-dominated psychiatric profession (Showalter 3).  Doctor Richard Napier saw that among his patients, women of all social classes complained more of stress and unhappiness in marriage, had more anxiety over their children, and suffered more depression than their male counterparts (Showalter 3). This goes to show that the stress of being a doting mother and wife was overwhelming for some women as they tried to live up to society’s idea of a perfect family woman. The women of the nineteenth century became so overworked trying to be the perfect housewife that they fell ill a lot from the stress and became delirious (Showalter 55). According to Lunbeck, seventy percent of manic-depressive patients “belong to the female sex with its greater emotional excitability.” This suggests that the gender difference was not just a matter of perception by society, but was encoded into the very categories that ordered psychiatrists’ observations (Lunbeck 148).

Biological Factors & Sexual Repression of Women
Another theory of why women were more susceptible to lunacy was because of their instability of their reproductive systems and the biological crises linked to the female life cycle including: puberty, pregnancy, childbirth, and menopause (Showalter 55). Their reproductive systems interfered with their sexual, emotional, and rational control, causing them to be more susceptible to insanity (Showalter 55). This connection between the female reproductive and nervous systems led to the condition called “reflex insanity in women” which led to a weakened mind because of their life cycles (Showalter 55).  In fact, most female patients were admitted to the asylums right after they went through puberty and experienced their first menstruation. Doctors then argued that menstrual discharge in itself predisposed women to insanity and irregular menstruation was seen as dangerous so they treated women with purgatives, forcing medicine, hip baths, and leeches on the thighs (Showalter 56). During the nineteenth century, females weren’t allowed to publicly talk about anything that was going on with their bodies and their mothers didn’t prepare them for it all, causing them to have a mental breakdown and have great feelings of anxiety and shame. In fact, twenty-five percent of female mental patients were left completely in the dark about their menstrual cycle and once they experienced their first period, they became frightened, screamed, and went into hysterical fits, causing them to be seen as mad (Showalter  57). Up until their first menstruation, girls were treated just like their brothers, but after, they were forbidden to participate in physical activities, traveling, exercising, and studying. Now a woman, the female had to give up everything and stay at home to become the perfect housewife (Showalter 57). Diagnosis for insanity was highly imperfect and the male psychiatrists used knowledge extracted from embarrassed and confused female patients (Lunbeck 143). Examination was an arena, after all, in which psychiatrist set the rules, called the plays, and determined the outcome, so no amount of a female explaining her menstrual situation would help her sanity in the doctor’s eyes (Lunbeck 143). This would explain why so many young women were committed right after their first menstrual cycle because not only were they confused about what was happening to their bodies, they were also deeply embarrassed too.
Many women were seen as lunatics with their sexual orientation and sexual desires, thus leading them to get committed. Up until the nineteenth century, women weren’t allowed to show their feelings and affection towards ones they loved and at the turn of the century, they had relaxed their sexual etiquette and were viewed as “hypersexual” (Lunbeck 188). Before, mothers taught their daughters that they were to feel no passion or sexual desire because, “in the conventional society, which men have made for women, and women have accepted, they must have none, they must act the farce of hypocrisy.” (Showalter 64). Victorian women were seen to have a lesser capacity for erotic pleasure than males and a lesser capacity for sexual feeling of her own; they were merely to see themselves as a passive vehicle of male sexuality (Reuther 145).  Reuther states, “Rapid industrialization went hand in hand with the depletion of the economic functions and sexism of women traditionally married and centered on the home.”  Industrialization drew many women into factory jobs and women soon turned away from the idea that their roles were to take care of her family and home (Reuther 197). With the times changing, many women stayed single, started dating around, got jobs, and even turned to lesbianism, something that was unheard of decades earlier. The nineteenth century became known for the intensifying crisis of the family: the rising divorce rate, the falling birthrate, and the lowering of moral standards (Lunbeck 18). Industry and feminism were loosening the bonds of family, tradition, and sexuality, setting women adrift (Lunbeck 18).  This was caused by the Victorian society attempt to pacify the contradiction between the women’s domesticity and sexual repression (Reuther 198). Women grew tired of being trapped in the private sector to service male compensatory needs and turned towards the same sex, giving up being a child nurturer and a textbook perfect housewife (Reuther 198). This behavior was frowned upon and the new found independence and sexual deviance led many women to the cells of an asylum (Lunbeck 194).
Being a single woman who was perfectly content without domesticity in her life proved to be impermissible. A thirty-nine year old French musician named Hersilie Rouy was sent to an asylum on behalf of the requests from her half-brother (Matlock 167). Hersilie was single and had very little income, but suspicions of lesbianism swirled around her and it was enough to have the authorities called. Matlock states, “Hersilie was labeled manipulative, dangerous, and sexually provocative by the doctors who examined her and she would find few resources-legal or otherwise-at her disposal.”  For the next fourteen years, Hersilie Rouy would attempt to write her way out of incarceration, keeping a journal which she hoped would convince officials that she had never been estranged of mind, but only the brunt of a terrible scheme by her family (Matlock 167). Hersilie’s writing evoked the doctors and her self-defense brought intolerable punishment down upon her: "It is usually against individuals who have their senses and know how to defend themselves or complain that they use these terrible means to break them” (Matlock 171). In an attempt to keep Hersilie quiet and stop her plans of proving her sanity, the doctors and nurses tried everything including: beatings; straightjackets; a shaved head; solitary confinement; imprisonment with dangerous patients, deprivation of: food, water, heat, clothing, light, or medical treatment, and most importantly, no writing (Matlock 171). Thankfully, Hersilie disobeyed the rules and wrote her story down on any surface she could use, with any ink she could obtain. Hersilie's writing gained her attention, hearings, and eventually protection under the law and she was set free (Matlock 168). Her story shows that a woman living a life different from the perfect housewife can easily be committed to an insane asylum, even if they are perfectly sane and they have to spend the rest of their life trying to prove it.
           
Insane Asylums: The Perfect Dumping Ground
The last reason a woman was thrown into an insane asylum was by her family and friends if they claimed the woman was insane. The woman couldn’t testify against it because that would prove that she was in denial and clearly insane. In a lot of cases, women were sent away by their husbands after they got sick of them and moved on to other love interests or when they thought their wives had become too expensive to take care of (Matlock 167).
Sigmund Freud discusses the case of Dora, who has been reformed by feminists as an illustration of gender conflicts in Victorian Europe (Akavia 193). Many think that Dora romanticized hysteria and regard her as a heroine whose illness is a form of revolt against societal norms while others pity her as a victimized figure (Akavia 193). Dora’s case is heavily influenced by her father who was sick all of his life and seeked treatment from Sigmund Freud for neurological complications of syphilis (Akavia 197). Her father made Dora his confidante and trusted her with his most intimate secrets, something that will later backfire for Dora and ruin her life (Akavia 203). During the nineteenth century, it was common for daughters to nurse their sick fathers back to health, but according to Freud, “this led to the young woman’s own illness and  anyone whose mind is taken up by the hundred and one tasks of sick-nursing . . . is creating material for a ‘retention hysteria’.” Akavia states that, “In addition to being deprived of sleep, obsessively worrying, and neglecting her own body, the nurse is compelled to preserve a demeanor of indifference when faced by a large number of disturbing impressions. She is therefore likely to repress them, sowing the seeds for her own hysteria.” The stress of taking care of her father and knowing that all her life consisted of was being a good housewife, deprived of anything intellectual, caused Dora to exhibit symptoms of hysteria. When her father’s health worsened, he hired a new nurse with whom he started an affair with.  Dora found out and threatened to tattle in exchange for more independence, but her father turned her over to Freud for psychotherapeutic treatment (Showalter 159). From Freud’s analysis and journal entries of Dora’s case, he blames her hysteria on the jealousy she felt from her father’s affair because she had repressed sexual desires for her father, rather than the stress of nursing (Akavia 207). Freud had her committed to an asylum because he thought she was obviously hysterical and had possible homosexual or incestual desires and when Dora denied the allegations, it only gave Freud further proof that she was insane, thus Dora spent the rest of her life as a neurotic patient (Showalter, 160). As many can see, the rise of the Victorian madwoman can be due to the fact that insane asylums were seen as an easy place to dump somebody that you no longer cared for or in Dora’s case, for knowing too much, no questions asked.
            Since women were seen as unstable lunatics, it’s no wonder they were treated poorly in the insane asylums. Very rarely did female patients get the help they actually needed and most of the time the women were swallowed up by the asylum and were never to be seen again, in fact, hundreds of women disappeared without a trace each year into the labyrinth of the psychiatric order (Matlock 167). Families that committed their female family members thought they were receiving the best care possible, but in reality little was known about how patients in insane asylums were treated and the patients would be beaten if they told anyone how they were really taken care of. Unfortunately, attendants had to resort to using force to administer treatment that often led to patients getting struck, kicked, punched, hair pulled, or not treated in a morally human way (Lunbeck 171).

Nellie Bly: Girl Stunt Reporter in 19th Century
Female journalist Nellie Bly can attest to the abuse received in insane asylums during the nineteenth century. Nellie’s story is fascinating and exposed a lot of the problems that insane asylums have, especially internal ones that dealt with the staff and how they did their jobs. Nellie, a stunt girl reporter looking for her next big break, faked hysteria and lunacy and fooled police officers, judges, and doctors who examined her and declared she was a crazy hysteric. Nellie was committed to Blackwell Island insane asylum for ten days where she saw some of the worst horrors of her life. By performing hysteria and being diagnosed by experts as "most definitely" a hysteric, Bly countered an expert discourse that often disempowered women (Lutes 221). She entered territory controlled by the predominantly male medical field, in which female sexuality was exposed, unmasked, and interpreted by men and by turning the tables and unmasking the male experts themselves, Bly positioned herself as an authoritative interpreter of one of the most threatening pockets of the city: the asylum (Lutes 221). Elizabeth Lunbeck emphasizes hysteria's unstable position within the production of expert knowledge: "To no other psychiatric category was the distinction between truth and reality on the one hand lies and simulation on the other so critical but so impossible to determine. No other category-and no other group of patients so stirred psychiatrists' anxiety and so unsettled their professional equanimity." The doctors who called Bly "hysterical" not only set themselves up for an embarrassing incident, but they also shaped Bly's emerging stunt-girl persona by giving her a label that was already vulnerable to manipulation (Lutes 232). After her experience at the asylum, Nellie Bly emerged as one of the nineteenth century’s most prominent and daring female journalist and took on many more stunt girl reports (Lutes 233).

Into the Mad-House
The women Nellie described around her looked like this, full of despair.
On Nellie’s first day there, she met a German woman who spoke very little English and because of that she was put in the asylum (Bly 26).  The nurses taunted and teased the poor woman because they knew that she didn’t know enough English to respond to them or tell on them (Bly 27). Nellie also met her first real companion there that she could confide in, a woman named Miss Tillie Mayard. Nellie asked her if she was insane and the woman’s response was, "No, but as we have been sent here, we will have to be quiet until we find some means of escape. They will be few, though, since all the doctors, refuse to listen to me or give me a chance to
Prove my sanity." (Bly 25). Sane women sent to asylums were condemned to them, never given a chance to explain why they were sent there, whether it is by a jealous family member or their sexual orientation.  The next morning, the women were woken up early to get their monthly bath that was one of the worst events Nellie endured there (Bly 32). The water they used was ice cold and the nurses scrubbed so hard that patients’ hair would come out and their skin would bleed.  The entire time the nurses ignored the complaints of pain and told the patients, "There isn't much fear of hurting you. Shut up or you'll get it worse." (Bly 32).  With forty-five patients, they only had two towels and never once got new bath water, something Nellie found disgusting because some of the women had lice and other flesh diseases. Nellie states, “I watched crazy patients who had the most dangerous eruptions all over their faces dry on the towels and then saw women with clean skins turn to use them. I went to the bathtub and washed my face at the running faucet and my underskirt did duty for a towel.” When Nellie tried to mention to the nurses that two towels wasn’t enough, especially with some of the women’s skin conditions, the nurses responded by saying, "Well, I don't care about that, you are in a public institution now, and you can't expect to get anything. This is charity, and you should be thankful for what you get.” (Bly 34). Nellie argued that the city pays to keep the place up and patients’ families pay for their keep, the nurses said, "Well, you don't need to expect any kindness here, for you won't get it.” (Bly 34). Obviously the city didn’t have enough money to properly maintain the asylum because the living conditions were very poor.  Nellie found it surprising the fact that the nurses did not once clean the ward, but it was the patients, who do it all themselves, even to cleaning the nurses' bedrooms and caring for their clothing (Bly 35).
Her entire time there, Nellie did not once see the doctors take interest in their patients.  Nellie pronounces, "There are sixteen doctors on this island, and excepting two, I have never seen them pay any attention to the patients. How can a doctor judge a woman's sanity by merely bidding her good morning and refusing to hear her pleas for release? Even the sick ones know it is useless to say anything, for the answer will be that it is their imagination." Nellie states, “When the doctors came, the patients made no movement to tell him of their sufferings and when I asked some of them to tell how they were suffering from the cold and insufficiency of clothing, they replied that the nurse would beat them if they told.” Sadly, the nurses took pleasure in beating, choking, and locking patients in closets for days, making their job with the patients a game of cat and mouse (Bly 39). Nellie talked to many women there who weren’t actually insane, but committed because of their families or friends. The saner they acted, the more insane the doctors thought and there was no way they could prove their innocence because no one took the time to listen. As Nellie states, “The insane asylum on Blackwell's Island is a human rat-trap. It is easy to get in, but once there it is impossible to get out”.
Courageous reporter Nellie Bly
The last part of her novel describes Nellie’s joyous feeling of being released and guilt that she felt for leaving women behind in the hands of horrible caretakers (Bly 49). After she left, Nellie appeared in front of a grand jury to talk about what really happened at Blackwell Island and soon the jury questioned the nurses and doctors there, who of course said Nellie was lying about the mistreatment (Bly 50). The jury decided to plan a visit to the Island and once they got there, saw it was clean and seemed like a “happy” place. This frustrated Nellie to no end because she knew they were putting on an act, trying to cover up for the things that actually occurred there (Bly 50). . Nellie got some of the patients to talk to the authorities and from this they determined that Bly wasn’t lying and that there needed to be some drastic changes at Blackwell Island (Bly 51). Nellie Bly knew she wanted to help those poor souls in the insane asylum and she wrote a book of her account called Ten Days in a Mad-House (Bly 51). Nellie states, “I have one consolation for my work, on the strength of my story, the committee of appropriation provides $1,000,000, more than was ever before given, for the benefit of the insane.”
            Nellie Bly’s account of the treatment patients received in one insane asylum during the nineteenth century is common for all insane asylums during this time period. Many asylums didn’t have funds to hire certified and compassionate nurses along with providing good living conditions. The women that Nellie met in the asylum were all sent there for reasons stated above, like signs

What does this all mean?
            The rise of the Victorian madwoman can be contributed to many reasons, but one can mostly see that regardless of mental illness or not, society views the female sex as mad and unstable. Many women were sent to asylums because they weren’t the perfect housewives the nineteenth century society called for and most times they cracked under the pressure of trying to live up to such high standards. The young Victorian female had to live almost a life of secrecy, never being able to discuss female puberty or their sexual desires for fear that they would be labeled insane. This female oppression only worsened when sane women weren’t give the right to testify their sanity, especially when their family members signed her rights away for a multitude of reasons. Nellie Bly’s account shows that women had no power in not only a male dominated society, but also a male dominated medical field, thus women’s voices and rights were taken away due to the lack of power. Our female ancestors faced a horrible oppression just for being a woman and sadly we still see that today. Women will forever be seen as mad lunatics running around due to the past history that men and insane asylums have given them. A common example of this can be seen when men state that women are acting crazy around their menstrual time of the month and this links the image of women and madness together today in the 21st century. Although women have been given more rights and are hardly ever sent to mental institutions for reasons found in the 19th century, there is still the stereotype of domesticity that surrounds the female sex and they seem as if they will never go away in a society that is still mildly male dominated. We will never know what moment in time linked women to madness, but we will forever have to live with the close minded stereotypes that our female ancestors had to face.








Works Cited

Akavia, Naamah. "Hysteria, Identification, and the Family: A Rereading of Freud's Dora Case." American Imago 62.2 (2005): 193-216. Project MUSE. Web. 14 May 2013. <http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.uwc.edu/journals/american_imago/v062/62.2akavia.html>.

Bly, Nellie. “Ten Days in a Mad-House.” New York, 1887. Print

Lunbeck, Elizabeth. "Hysteria: The Revolt of the "Good Girl"" The Psychiatric Persuasion. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994.Print.

Lutes, Jean Marie. "Into The Madhouse With Nellie Bly: Girl Stunt Reporting In Late Nineteenth-Century America." American Quarterly 54.2 (2002): 217. Academic Search Complete. Web. 25 Mar. 2013.

Matlock, Jann. "Doubling out of the Crazy House: Gender, Autobiography, and the Insane Asylum System in Nineteenth-Century France." Representations. Vol. 34. N.p.: University of California, 1991. 166-95. JSTOR. Web. 1 Apr. 2013.

N.d. Kyle. Photograph. Vict’n Women. 2013. Wikispaces. Victorian Era. Web. 16 May.2013

N.d. Photograph. Nellie Bly. Wikipedia, 2013. Web. 16 May 2013. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nellie_Bly>.
N.d. Photograph. Victorian Pattern. 2013.SBI. Victorian Interior Design Ideas. Web. 16 May. 2013

Ruether, Rosemary Radford. “New Woman, New Earth: Sexist Ideologies and Human Liberation”. New York: Seabury, 1975. Print.

Showalter, Elaine. "The Rise of the Victorian Madwoman." The Female Malady. New York: Pantheon, 1985. Print.

Stocks. Cassie. Ohio Insane Asylum. 1946. Dance, Gladys, Dance. Web. Image. 16 May. 2013

Yildirim, Aşkın Haluk. "Angels of the House: Dickens' Victorian Women." Dokuz Eylul University Journal Of Graduate School Of Social Sciences 14.4 (2012): 113-125. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17 May 2013.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Annotated Bibliography


Whitney Walters
Dr. Halverson
English 102
16 May 2013
Annotated Bibliography

        Akavia, Naamah. "Hysteria, Identification, and the Family: A Rereading of Freud's Dora Case." American Imago 62.2 (2005): 193-216. Project MUSE. Web. 14 May 2013. <http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.uwc.edu/journals/american_imago/v062/62.2akavia.html>.

      This rereading of Freud’s Dora case delves into how she has become an illustration of gender conflicts in Victorian Europe. They regard Dora as a heroine whose illness was a form of revolt against societal norms, while others pity her as a victimized figure. The article details her family and how they influenced Dora’s hysterical behavior, which was only brought on by the stress of taking care of her sick father her entire life, leaving her to be deprived of sleep, obsessively worrying, and neglecting her own body with the added stress that she was condemned to the life of a housewife when she really wanted to pursue education. Freud believes that her hysterical symptoms come from a repressed sexual desire for her father and she mimics his symptoms for his attention. When her father starts an affair with his nurse, Dora threatens to expose them and her father officially turns her over to the care of Sigmund Freud.
      I thought this article was wonderful and very trust-worthy because it had entries from Freud’s journal about Dora’s case and her symptoms. It looked into both sides, taking Dora’s view of how her symptoms of hysteria were merely caused by the stress of her life, not a predisposed sexual repression that Freud insinuated. The article was very credible and listed other sources from psychological scholarly journals and from some of Freud’s other works.
      I plan on using Dora’s story to show how easily women can be thrown into insane asylums by the ones they thought they could trust. Dora was turned over to Freud and believed to be insane, thus spending the rest of her life in an asylum, even though her hysterical symptoms were caused by the heavy responsibilities of caring for her sick father.

2  Bly, Nellie. “Ten Days in a Mad-House.” New York, 1887. Print.

This book was a documentation of the female journalist named Nellie Bly that my paper focuses a lot. She tells of the horrors she endured while committed to a madhouse around 1887. In detail, Nellie depicts what happened to her day by day and how her stunt reporting helped the insane asylum.
      This source was very credible because it was the accounts of Nellie Bly and if anyone knew what nineteenth century insane asylums were like, it would be Nellie Bly.
      I plan on using this book for my primary research as a cultural analysis and to incorporate her experiences in my paper to prove how women were viewed as lunatics by society during this Victorian period.

3 Brincklé, Adriana P. "Life Among the Insane." The North American Review. 363rd ed. Vol. 144. N.p.:  University of Northern Iowa, 1887. 190-99. JSTOR. Web. 1 Apr. 2013. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25101179 .>.

 In this article, Adriana Brincklé tells her story about being locked up in an insane asylum for twenty-eight years for being too extravagant and too fond of dress. She relied heavily on her family for financial issues and they soon tired of her and hard her committed in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania under the insanity defense in 1857. Her article talks about the nurses she encountered there and how many weren’t rational beings. In fact, most of the nurses were promoted to nursing after first being patients there and they were not properly trained to deal with the mentally unstable. They resorted to using violence and brutality with the patients and expected them to do their work for them like sweeping and cleaning rooms. Adriana then goes on to talk in detail about all the patients she encountered and how mistreated they were along with the laissez-faire approach the nurses took when actually caring for the patients.
            Overall, I don’t think this article was very credible because it was just a journal entry from a woman who was wrongly convicted and it also doesn’t seem very reliable, but rather elementary. The information in the article is extremely biased because we aren’t hearing the nurses’ side of the story, only the wrongly convicted side. Adriana’s goal was to tell her story of how she was committed and wasn’t insane, a common theme popping up around the 19th century.
            The article had a lot of useless information that will not help shape my research question. I will use some of the accounts of the nurses’ mistreatment in my paper and how it was very easy for a woman to get wrongly committed to a mental institution. This article has made me interested at looking into why the 19th century had a rise of women put in insane asylums against their own will.

4Lunbeck, Elizabeth. "Hysteria: The Revolt of the "Good Girl"" The Psychiatric Persuasion. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994. 209-28. Print.

            The chapter from this book that I read looked into why hysterical women made up one quarter of patients in insane asylums and how they had become hysterical. During the 19th century, women who were committed to asylums for hysteria suffered from depression, crying spells, severe inexplicable pains, vertigo, fainting spells, paraplegias, twitching, tremors, and convulsions. Psychiatrists created three groups that these hysterical women belonged to. The first group was women who had be raped or subjected to incest, the second group were women who experienced what men considered “normal” heterosexuality, and the third group was women who experienced terrors of womanhood like childbirth and menstruation. The fact that so many females were considered hysteric was blamed on the sexual ignorance and lack of education given to women about their bodies, something that was also brought up by Elaine Showalter’s book.
            This source seems very credible because it had statements from doctors and psychiatrists during the 19th century who dealt with and treated hysteric women. It had a lot of facts and figures and many of the same ideas that Elaine Showalter had explored. The goal of this chapter in the book was to explore why women became insane and hysteric and why acting hysterically has long meant to act as a woman.
            I plan on using this information along with Elaine Showalter’s information to explore why the 19th century had such an increase of committed women. I will also use facts and stories from this chapter about hysteria to talk about Nellie Bly, the journalist who faked hysteria to get committed.  It seems that lack of education about sex and menstruation was a big cause as to why women became insane and I want to look further into that idea and why education could not be given.

5 Lutes, Jean Marie. "Into The Madhouse With Nellie Bly: Girl Stunt Reporting In Late Nineteenth-Century America." American Quarterly 54.2 (2002): 217. Academic Search Complete. Web. 25 Mar. 2013.

       Jean Marie Lutes looked into the life and success of female journalist Nellie Bly who started her career as a stunt girl journalist during 1887. One of her projects was to feign insanity and get committed to the insane asylum Blackwell’s Island, where the conditions were known to be poor and provided cheap care for impoverished mentally ill immigrants (Lutes, 217). After her story of her time at the insane asylum was published, Nellie became known as an expert in girl stunt reporting, which gave women journalists a way to profit from the attention so frequently focused on their bodies (Lutes, 219). Lutes’ article talks about the mistreatment of asylum inmates and Nellie’s success in deceiving police officers, judges, doctors, and nurses. Nellie’s act of hysteria was shocking to everyone because hysteria was only thought to be in “savage” women of color (Lutes, 229) and in women who were sexually promiscuous. In fact, hysteria was applied to any woman who was unable to express herself except through body language, making the doctors think that Nellie was not only hysteric but also a nymphomaniac and during this time, the orderlies and doctors blamed the women in the insane asylum for male acts of sexual aggression (Lutes, 233). The article ends with all of Nellie’s achievements in the journalism field by going undercover in some of the most unsafe conditions and how Nellie became the pioneer woman of stunt reporting.
     The article had a few journal entries of Nellie’s that really helped me understand her desire and passion to make herself known in the journalism field, thus the only reason why she checked into a mental institution. It seems like a useful source when looking into girl stunt reporting and the treatment of women in mental institutions. When reading the article, I did notice that the author seemed almost mad at the way women journalists were laughed at by men because of the fact that they were girls so the article may be a little biased towards women.
     I think this article will be a good source to use for my research paper because it had many of Nellie’s accounts that make it more relatable to not only me, but also my readers. I will use this article to explain the thought process behind why Nellie did what she did and exactly how she pulled this stunt off. The article also brought up the idea that women who were in mental institutions were viewed as sexually promiscuous and taken advantage of because of this and I plan to use this to describe how terrible living conditions were at insane asylums for women who were diagnosed with hysteria, like Nellie Bly.

6Matlock, Jann. "Doubling out of the Crazy House: Gender, Autobiography, and the Insane Asylum System       in Nineteenth-Century France." Representations. Vol. 34. N.p.: University of California, 1991. 166-95. JSTOR. Web. 1 Apr. 2013.

This article tells the story of a woman from Paris named Hersilie Rouy who was taken from her apartment and committed to a private mental hospital at the request of her half-brother in 1854. While there for fourteen years, she managed to get scraps of paper and pencils, although sometimes she would have to write in her own blood, and wrote down her experiences there and how she planned to show these writings to prove that she was sane. Her writings mention how asylums entrapped women with greater ease, kept them longer, and released them less frequently than men counterparts and how the women were only allowed to write letters every two weeks which were reviewed by doctors so they didn’t speak badly of the asylum. She lastly mentions the treatments that she endured there, like torture, beatings, straightjackets, shaved heads, solitary confinement, imprisonment with dangerous patients, deprivation of food, water, heat, clothing, light, and medical treatment. 
     This article is a credible source because it is an eye-witness account of the treatment received in French asylums during the middle of the 19th century. Jann Matlock accurately covered the experiences Hersilie went through being a middle class woman who was thought to be insane and her goal was to show us the struggles Hersilie went through to prove her sanity.
     I plan on using this to talk about how women were viewed in the asylums in the 19th century and some of the harsh treatment they received. When I started this project, I knew that I wanted to work with actual diary and journal accounts of women in asylums and this is a perfect article for that. Some questions this article brings up is why do the asylums swallow women and not men, making it seem like the women committed fell off the face of the Earth. Also, why did asylums restrict the women from writing and outside communication?


7 Ruether, Rosemary Radford. New Woman, New Earth: Sexist Ideologies and Human Liberation. New York: Seabury, 1975. Print.

            This book looked into different reasons as to why there was the liberation of women and how women were viewed by men in the times of Adam and Eve. The book also delves into why women were viewed as witches and mentions a lot about the witch trials they endured just because they were women. It also looked into how race and social class affected the liberation of women and their sexual repression.  The book mentioned Victorian women a little bit and how, thanks to the Freudian Revolution, they threw away the common belief that they were only allowed to practice domesticity and went out and got jobs.
            The book is a credible source because it has in-text citations and works cited with scholarly journals and academic books that I also looked into. I trust this book very much because the author explored many ways as to why women gained a new found freedom after being repressed since the beginning of the Bible ages.
            This book wasn’t very useful, I spent more time skimming through a lot of information that was interesting, but didn’t apply to my research question or research paper. The parts that did relate to my paper and the 19th century is useful, but I feel like it provided me with very little information and I’m left wanting more to use in my research paper. I plan on using the information I did get to explain why women were liberated and thus, put into insane asylums for practicing this new found freedom.

8  Showalter, Elaine. "The Rise of the Victorian Madwoman." The Female Malady. New     York: Pantheon, 1985. 51-73. Print.

            Elaine Showalter’s book titled The Female Malady looks into the rise of the Victorian Madwoman during the mid-nineteenth century and what caused an increase of women in insane asylums. Interestingly enough, in the beginning of the 19th century, men were more commonly committed to asylums and women were usually caretakers for the patients. This soon changed when the Lunatics Act was passed and women weren’t allowed access to medical education. This caused insane asylums to have an unusual amount of female patients and doctors believed this was because females experienced insanity linked to their life and menstrual cycle. They found many of their female patients were admitted shortly after the lady got her menstrual cycle or started menopause or right after she gave birth. This was just a beginning to why women were committed though, many doctors also believed that women became insane because there was a suffocation of family life and boredom destroys women’s capacity to dream, work, or act. The rest of the chapter has excerpts from books by Florence Nightingale and Charlotte Bronte about why the Victorian women developed insanity and took over the insane asylums.
            I found this chapter of her book to be tremendously helpful and informative and very credible because it had excerpts from other books that looked at the link between women and insanity. The source wasn’t biased because it looked at both a man’s perspective as to why women are more susceptible to insanity and a woman’s. The goal of this chapter was to look at why there was an increase in female patients during the mid-nineteenth century.
            Elaine Showalter’s book will help me look at why the Victorian era had so many women committed to asylums and how society viewed these “insane” women. My research question deals with reporter Nellie Bly who faked hysteria to get into an asylum and this was around the exact same time of the rise of women in asylums. I want to look into this and see how they are linked and why. This source had a lot of excerpts from books that I plan on looking up and using for research as well. Lastly, this chapter has me thinking about straying away from women journalists and mental institutions and look into why women were mostly committed during the 19th century.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Critical Reflection V

After receiving my second draft of my research paper, the main comment I received was to broaden my searches and find more sources because I relied heavily on one very good source, a book called The Female Malady by Elaine Showalter. Although the book had quite a bit of useful information, I need to find more scholarly sources that are more in-depth with the topic of female lunacy in the 19th century. My professor also commented that I need to bring in more sources that look into Victorian domesticity and the oppression of women. She gave me the names of a few articles and books that will be beneficial to how women were viewed in the 19th century and the sexual deviance women started to experience as they grew more independent. I realize that I need to do more research on this sexual deviance because I briefly mentioned it in my essay, but I could really build on it and explore why women were becoming independent and how it affected their sexuality. Another comment I received was to quote more from my story of Nellie Bly,  the female journalist who faked lunacy to see what living in an insane asylum was like. I briefly went through her book and told of her experience in the madhouse, but I failed to quote enough and connect the information back to my original thesis. My professor gave me examples of how I can connect Bly's story and my thesis by looking into gender roles and oppression and using this information to prove my thesis. I realize that I could expand more on how Nellie's story speaks to the rise of the Victorian madwoman. This part of my essay is the section that needs the most revising because I didn't quote enough from Bly's book and I need to edit some parts out or add some new ideas in to the section. Overall, the comments I received were wonderful to hear because I had been struggling with how to tie in Bly's story and my professor has given me a few ideas and more sources that could help me do that. An idea that I never thought of but received in a comment was the fact that I need to historicize Bly more instead of directly relying on her one story. It would be great in my paper to use other sources that provide context for her "stunt" and use those to not only show the rise of the Victorian madwoman, but also the rise of the independent woman who didn't necessarily follow all of the social norms and rules. 
Two goals that were highlighted for my research essay was to understand and consider multiple perspectives and identify bias along with distinguishing between "reporting on" or regurgitating information and taking a position and supporting it using source material. This makes complete sense because my paper seems to only be taking one side when looking into why there was a rise in the Victorian madwoman. I know that I need to find a few more sources that will counter what I have used as examples and arguments in my essay and use theses sources to show that there are two different sides that can be taken. The second goal makes sense to me too because I realize that I need to take a position and support it by using source material along with taking more of a perspective of my sources. I also know that I have really relied on regurgitating information but not supporting it and taking a position. I think that I need to find more sources to fulfill these goals and really take a side that can support my thesis. The main problem in my paper is the lack of argument and I'm hoping to find a few more articles that can help me pose two sides to my thesis.

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Critical Reflection 4

      One goal that I chose to examine was reading. Part of this goal is to understand data, identify controlling idea of a text, grapple with arguments, paraphrase and summarize sources, and analyze the content of an argument. I feel that when writing my annotated bibliography, I succeeded in understanding my articles and paraphrasing their content along with evaluating if it was a good source to use for my research paper. It took me a while to read the articles and pick out what the main arguments were and how can they help me develop my research question, but soon I picked how to precisely read an article and take accurate notes. Unfortunately, it took me a while to gain this skill and my first annotated bibliography suffered because of it. My first bibliography draft was much too lengthy and didn't get to the main points of the article, it had a lot of extra fluff in it that wasn't really needed. For my next annotated bibliography, I found it easier to pick out what was useful and to summarize the article precisely. Understanding and analyzing my articles has really helped me decide what will be useful for my paper and what takes away from the overall quality of my paper. I started off with ordering a large amount of books and articles off the library website and narrowed it down to a few sources that could really help shape my research question and thesis statement. I made sure to read all of the articles and take notes along with flagging certain passages that I found useful or interesting and then from there I had to decide what articles would help and which ones would harm.
       A second goal I worked towards was writing. Writing involves identifying and developing a topic to research, constructing a logical argument, identifying refute counterarguments, distinguishing between reporting on or regurgitating information and taking a position, synthesizing and integrating source material, and supporting a thesis using credible and accurate source material. When I first started this assignment, my research topic was all over the place. I knew that I wanted to research mental institutions, but I didn't know what else I would look into for my paper. I then found a story of a female journalist who faked lunacy to see how insane asylums were like, and her story has really fueled and guided me into what my current draft is now. My very first research proposal only focused on women journalists faking lunacy, but now my paper has changed to look at why there was such a rise of the Victorian madwoman and how they were treated by caretakers and by society. My research question has taken a huge turn, but I still find it difficult to choose a side on my topic. I feel as if there is really no way to choose a side, either you agree with putting innocent women in insane asylums or you don't, and this has really frustrated me when writing my paper. I'm hoping that after I get my current draft back, my professor can help me figure out what argument I should take and how to incorporate it in my paper. Recently, I have started working towards developing a sound thesis, something that seemed so much easier in high school, but is now proving to be very difficult for me. I liked my thesis and still do, but my peers seemed to think it was confusing and non relevant. I have started trying to  change my thesis and make it more precise, it needs to get to the point of what my paper is about, not just some jumbled nonsense to end my introduction.
     The last goal I chose to achieve was processes. This involves demonstrating a command of multiple drafts and completing a successful text, developing strategies for generating, revising, editing, and proofreading, understanding the collaborative and social aspects of writing processes, critiquing their own and other's works, and learning to balance the advantages of relying on others with the responsibility of doing their part. I feel that I have achieved this goal by writing many drafts of my research paper and taking into account my professor's critiques and my peer's critiques. I have always made sure to edit my paper and listen to what others think would be better because the advice of my peers and professor really matter. If they don't like the paper, chances are many others won't like the paper too. I have also learned better peer editing skills in this class by going to my conferences. At first I was hesitant to give others my opinion, but after I while I felt confident in helping others with their paper and bouncing ideas off of them to improve their writing. I have also found that conferences have really led me critique and edit my own paper. I now know what to look for when it involves writing and this has helped me look for that or the absence of that in my paper. Lastly, I have realized that I cannot take every little criticism and fix it in my paper. When writing my current draft, I took much of the criticism I received into account and tried to fix it, but I didn't take everything into account because after all, it is my paper and if I don't agree with some of the critiques, I am not going to change my paper for someone else.

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Critical Reflection 3

For my primary research I read the book called Ten Days in a Madhouse by Nellie Bly. The book is all of her accounts while faking lunacy and getting committed into an insane asylum during the 19th century and mentions a great deal of how women were treated back then and reasons as to why no one believed them when they were actually sane. I read the book and took notes by chapter, only jotting down things that described how women were treated, not what she ate for food everyday. Nellie Bly's book and one of the books I read for secondary research called The Female Malady by Elaine Showalter had a lot of the same concepts when it came to looking at how women were viewed during the 19th century. Although Nellie's book didn't explain why there was such a rise of the Victorian madwoman, it stated why each woman Nellie talked to was committed, and most were either cases where the woman didn't know English and couldn't properly communicate or her husband got sick of her and sent her away. This will help me to answer my research question of why was there such a rise in the Victorian madwoman during the 19th century. My primary and secondary research had a lot of the same concepts, like mistreatment of women in insane asylums and how women were viewed as hysterics and why. For structuring my research paper, I plan to look up some more work about the psychological and scientific background to madness in the mind and will most likely read articles by Freud on this. I think when writing my paper, I will start off with explaining Nellie's story and then go into the actual facts about the rise of the Victorian madwoman, referencing to Nellie's account whenever possible.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Annotated Bibliography Feedback

Overall I received good feedback for my annotated bibliography and my professor could see how my research question was evolving and changing by the sources I had used and the articles I had read. I was told that I need to look into the notion of hysteria and its rise as a scientific diagnosis and field of study. My professor recommended looking into some of Freud's work and the feminist critics of Freud to maybe understand the notion of hysteria. One of the source that I used followed a girl's journey in an insane asylum for twenty-eight years. My professor said that it was more along the lines of a primary source and could be used for cultural analysis to look at Victorian gender norms and expectations for women during the 19th century. After getting my feedback I definitely think I will need to do more secondary research and look into the scientific theory behind why there was a rise of the Victorian madwoman. I plan on using scientific journals and medical journals to look at the diagnosis of hysteria and to also look at Freud's work to understand his thoughts on the subject.